Mergers and acquisitions
New ownership, new obligations and old habits meeting inside one company.
Independent consultant · teams carrying a change
After a merger, a move into adjacent markets, dual-use, or a regulatory shock, the risk usually comes from reasonable people doing what they believe is right. Every side has a fair claim. What one person cares about is another person's boundary. I help leaders and teams find those lines, often where one has already been crossed.
A few weeks of confidential one-to-one conversations, scaled to the size of your company. Then the people doing the work make sense of what surfaced, together, and decide what to do with it.
Thirty years in product, operations and delivery. One PE-owned cross-border post-close integration involved eight acquired product suites across two countries. Work across agri-food, telecom, healthcare, government, public safety and dual-use technology.
Where it starts
New ownership, new obligations and old habits meeting inside one company.
Commercial teams learning where fast sharing meets need to know.
Sanctions, export controls or a new regulator change who you can sell to and what you can share. Teams built for the old rules keep working to them.
New tools, new handoffs and new decisions arriving before people have agreed how the work should move.
The diagnostic
I lead every engagement personally. The diagnostic begins with confidential conversations across the affected work, then a working session with leadership to decide what needs attention and what can move.
01
Confidential one-to-one conversations across the teams living the change, usually over a few weeks. How many depends on the size of the company. I watch how the work moves as well as what people say about it.
02
In the working session, the people living the change see where fair claims collide, where handoffs drop, and which unmarked lines are slowing the work.
03
Your leaders and the people doing the work come together. I run the session and bring the tools. Their own words, with names removed, go into the room. The room decides what they mean. Everyone in that room needs the authority to agree and act. If some decisions sit with people who aren't there, working out who decides becomes its own session. Meanwhile, the room acts on what it can decide. I don't add another layer of approvals. The point is to take drag out of the work.
They choose what to change first. They agree what to watch for, including what they didn't expect, and meet again when the signals change. Short Praxis sessions help them practise the hard conversations along the way.
“Most of the risk in a change sits between people who are each doing their job well.”
Explore servicesFrom a client
“The magic that Sherryl brings to collaboration is that she sees past the ingrained dogma and asks the questions that shine a light on the 'Why'. The key to finding the right path forward is to focus on the goal you are trying to achieve, and Sherryl knows how to get to the core of the problem by drawing on the collective experience of the teams involved in the challenge.”
Cam Cullen, CMO, Blastwave
Who it is for
When two companies share one name and nobody has agreed how the work moves between them.
See the cases →With a portfolio company where the deal has closed and the work has gone quiet.
Where regulation changes how the work gets done. Dual use is the sharpest version of this.
Explore dual use →When the old approvals no longer fit the work.
Usually a CEO or president, an operating partner, or the person handed the integration.
A clear place to start
You do not need a finished diagnosis or a ready-made scope before reaching out. Start with the condition that has made the work slow down.
Start a conversation